Why court has halted Sh17 billion Mombasa waste project
Coast
By
David Njaaga
| Dec 04, 2025
High Court in Mombasa has certified as urgent a petition challenging the county government's approval of a Sh17 billion waste management project without county assembly approval or public participation.
Justice Jairus Ngaah on Tuesday directed that the application be served immediately and gave respondents and interested parties seven days to file their responses.
The court will give directions on how the application will be disposed of on December 15.
The petition, filed on November 28 under a certificate of urgency, contests the legality of the waste management contract approved by the Mombasa County Government.
Petitioner Mohamed Ali, the current MP for Nyali Constituency, argues the county government bypassed mandatory legislative and public consultation processes in approving the multibillion-shilling contract.
READ MORE
Ngugi wa Thiong'o and the African literary revolution
Morocco set for fresh protests after demonstrators killed
12 years on, experts warn terrorism threat still looms
KDF smell league title after win in Nakuru
12 years of devolution: The good, the bad, and the unfinished
Tears as 12-year-old Bridget Njoki is laid to rest
Senate urged to create law allowing recall of Nominated MCAs
The unsung pedagogies behind Ngugi wa Thiong'o
A tribute to the giant of African literature Ngugi wa Thiong'o
Ngugi wa Thiong'o: Gen Zs share tributes of late literary icon
The Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EAC), the County Government of Mombasa, and eight others have been named as respondents and interested parties in the case.
The project, covering design, construction, financing, operation, and eventual transfer of a waste-to-energy plant in Mwakirunge, comes amid ongoing challenges in the county’s waste management.
Residents and watchdogs have raised concerns about illegal dumping sites, inefficient collection systems, and lack of transparency in procurement processes.
Under the County Governments Act, public participation is required in major infrastructure decisions, and the petitioner argues the approval of this project violated these legal obligations.
Oversight bodies and lawmakers have previously flagged concerns over the project’s tendering process, prompting calls for investigation and accountability.