Kenya's nuclear future must be powered by trust
Opinion
By
Peter Gichuki
| Jun 04, 2025
On May 3, 2025, local leaders in Kilifi County made headlines by unanimously rejecting a proposal to host a nuclear power plant.
Their decision wasn’t just a reaction to the idea of nuclear energy—it was a protest against being excluded from the process.
For many residents of Uyombo, the proposed site, this wasn’t just about concrete and radiation. It was about consent, information, and their right to shape their own future.
Most locals say they were never consulted. The only narratives they had heard came from anti-nuclear advocacy groups warning of radiation risks. Meanwhile, the government and its agencies offered little in the way of timely, accessible, or comprehensive information.
Crucial questions—about displacement, environmental impact, and economic disruption—were left unanswered.
Beyond the fear of radiation, there were legitimate concerns about losing homes, land, and livelihoods. Many community members are farmers and fishermen who felt blindsided by a process that appeared opaque and top-down.
Without a clear explanation of how Uyombo was selected, residents felt like casualties of a larger national plan in which they had no voice.
This approach must change.
Kenya should consider a more inclusive and democratic model: a county-led competition to host nuclear reactors. This system—already in practice in countries like Norway—places power in the hands of communities. There, municipalities like Farsund and Lund sign cooperation agreements with nuclear companies to explore feasibility. Early-stage studies follow—evaluating site suitability, environmental impact, and community benefits—before any decision is made.
In Kenya, counties willing to host a plant should submit public bids outlining how they plan to manage safety, protect the environment, and leverage the plant to bring jobs, clinics, schools, and infrastructure to their people.
These proposals should be debated and refined by citizens and county assemblies before being presented to the State. Only the bids that balance Vision 2030 goals with genuine local support would move forward.
This bidding model offers transparency, consent, and accountability. It ensures communities are not just consulted, but are active participants in shaping Kenya’s energy future.
For this to succeed, however, Kenya’s Nuclear Power and Energy Agency (NuPEA) and the Ministry of Energy must rethink how they communicate. Issuing press releases is not enough. We need boots on the ground—outreach teams in every county, public forums, local radio programs, and community information centres operating in indigenous languages.
While NuPEA says it has held forums and published materials in local dialects, Kilifi’s backlash reveals these efforts have fallen short. The cornerstone of any nuclear rollout must be informed consent. Nuclear energy, alongside renewables, offers Kenya a real path toward industrialisation.
-Gichuki is Project Officer with WePlanet Africa
CAF slashes Kasarani Stadium capacity to 60pc over security lapses
CAF imposes 60pc Stadium capacity, entry restricted to electronic tickets after Kasarani Stadium incident, warns failure to implement to attract serious sanction.Kenya Under-20 Lacrosse team seeks government support
The Kenya men’s national team is seeking government support to travel to Jeju, South Korea for the 2025 World Lacrosse Men’s Under-20 Championship that begins on August 15.Alfred Cheruiyot wins Roan Antelope Half Marathon for the second time
Alfred Cheruiyot has defended his title in this year’s Roan Antelope Half Marathon at Ruma National Park in Homa Bay County.CAF halts ticket sales for Kasarani fixtures over security breaches
The Confederation of African Football (CAF) has suspended ticket sales for all upcoming fixtures at the Moi International Sports Centre, Kasarani.Kenyan players fly out for trials in Egypt
Four Kenyan youngsters from Nakuru and Kajiado counties have left the country for Cairo, Egypt to take part in football trials.MOST READ
