Court declares ex-Speaker's ouster illegal, orders assembly to pay him
National
By
Nancy Gitonga
| Feb 27, 2025
It is a big win for the former Speaker of Kisumu County Assembly after the Court of Appeal declared that his impeachment unlawful.
A three-judge Bench Wednesday ruled that Onyango Oloo’s ouster violated his constitutional rights, particularly his right to a fair hearing.
Justices Festus Asike-Makhandia, Hellen Omondi and Luka Kimaru also ordered the Kisumu County Assembly to pay Oloo six-month salary and outstanding allowances.
The judges found that Oloo had not been given sufficient time to prepare his defence, and that the impeachment proceedings had been rushed and unjust.
READ MORE
Global experts convene in Nairobi for Clean-Air Forum 2025
The worst of Trump's tariffs on trade has passed, says report
Metropol, KBA to boost women led businesses
TECNO to launch SPARK 40 series as first smartphone powered by Helio G200 chipset
Unlocking Africa's potential: The promise of blended finance
IGAD rallies African unity at AU mid-year summit, champions Agenda 2063 vision
Cybervergent listed among 2025 WEF technology pioneers
Tax collections rise to Sh 2.571 trillion as KRA exceeds target
The court also determined that the process had not adhered to the necessary legal procedures, including the provisions of the County Assembly Standing Orders.
The decision overturns a previous ruling by the Employment and Labour Relations Court, which had upheld the impeachment.
Oloo was kicked out after allegations of misconduct, abuse of office and failure to perform his duties effectively. His impeachment was also based on allegations that he was facing corruption charges regarding the Sh4.1 billion Lake Basin Mall scandal at a Miliamani Court
The ouster Motion was presented to the Clerk on September 17, 2019, and was swiftly approved and scheduled for debate the next day. Oloo was served with an impeachment notice via WhatsApp on the debate day.
The notice, sent at 1.26pm, invited Oloo to defend himself before the Assembly at 3.00pm.
The former Speaker argued that this short notice did not give him a reasonable opportunity to prepare and present his case, thus violating his rights.
“I was only given a mere one-and-a-half hours to prepare a defense against serious charges. This clearly goes against the principles of natural justice, which guarantee fair hearing and administrative fairness,” said his petition.
Through his legal team led by Prof Tom Ojienda, Oloo further claimed that he was barred from accessing the assembly to present his case, with hired goons obstructing his entry.
Despite attempts to appear and request an adjournment, MCAs proceeded with the Motion, resulting in a vote of 42 members, constituting 75 per cent of the members, in favour of his impeachment.
The Court of Appeal agreed, noting that this was a breach of his right to a fair trial, which is a fundamental aspect of the Constitution, according to the court.
“The notice for the impeachment hearing was sent to him only hours before the session, leaving him with insufficient time to prepare a defense.”
The court also criticised MCAs for failing to follow procedures during the impeachment process.
“The Kisumu County Assembly did not comply with its own rules of procedure, and as such, the impeachment process was tainted and unconstitutional,” the judges ruled.