High Court nullifies Kakamega County Pension Scheme Act
National
By
Esther Nyambura
| Sep 19, 2025
The High Court on Friday, September 19, quashed the enactment of the Kakamega County Pension Scheme Act, 2022, ruling that only the Salaries and Remuneration Commission (SRC) has the mandate to set and review remuneration for State officers.
A three-judge bench sitting in Kakamega, Justices Jacqueline Nyambura Kamau, Patrick Juma Okwaro Otieno, and Chirchir Sophie Chebet, declared the law unconstitutional, stating that county governments lack powers to determine or regularly review the pay and benefits of State officers.
“The setting and regular review of remuneration and benefits, including retirement benefits, for State officers in the county government is a function that is exclusively vested in the Salaries and Remuneration Commission by dint of Article 230(4) of the Constitution,” the bench ruled.
The court further held that the assembly acted in violation of Article 185 and the Fourth Schedule of the Constitution, which outlines the legislative authority of county assemblies.
It also faulted the county for breaching Article 10 by failing to conduct stakeholder engagement and public participation before awarding retirement benefits to the Governor, Deputy Governor, Speaker, and Members of the County Assembly from August 8, 2017.
READ MORE
Safaricom shareholding change won't alter governance - Ndegwa
Remittances slide under Trump policies
Kenya Pipeline IPO launches as State eyes Sh106b
How effective is your board in these changing times?
Conference tourism drives growth as Bomas centre nears completion
Kenyan firm expands services to Gulf region
Joho faces big test in executing State's mining agenda in Coast
Economists foresee slow growth ahead for Sub-Saharan Africa
Old buildings give way to used-car showrooms
Mbadi: Swift action and luck saved Kenya from sovereign debt default
As a result, the judges declared: “The Kakamega County (State Officers) Pension Scheme Act, 2022 is unconstitutional, null and void ab initio.”
The ruling stemmed from a petition by SRC, which argued that the County Assembly of Kakamega had acted contrary to Article 230(4)(a) of the Constitution and in excess of the retirement benefits outlined in a Gazette Notice of March 1, 2013, later updated in July 2022.