Trouble at Communications Authority over recruitment of fund's director
National
By
Special Correspondent
| Feb 07, 2026
Trouble is looming at the Communications Authority of Kenya (CA) board following a standoff over the recruitment of a Director of Public Affairs at the Universal Service Fund (USF).
This comes after a section of officials sitting on an interview panel at the authority on Friday raised alarm over what they describe as intimidation and harassment by senior government-linked persons.
A source who spoke to The Standard on anonymity said the panel was conducting interviews for the said position when some of the members allegedly began receiving calls and text messages perceived as coercive and threatening.
The source said the calls are linked to a former senior official at the institution who is allegedly pushing for the consideration of a preferred candidate deemed unqualified for the role.
Earlier on, it had been reported that the board had refused to be coerced into considering another candidate who works for Huawei Kenya.
READ MORE
Capital markets boon: Did global AI, tech hype turbocharge NSE?
NSSF records highest returns now sets eyes on Sh1tr fund size
Business leaders renew pressure over pending bills
Rising middle class fuels new wave of lifestyle housing development
What the new green number plates for electric vehicles mean
Kenya-UK trade reaches all time high of Sh360b
Survey: Towels, bathrobes and toiletries most stolen by visitors in hotel rooms
Fund crosses Sh1b in assets under management
Last big cheque: State to earn Sh11.2b Safaricom dividend as share sale nears
State pushes for just transition for businesses in AI age to protect jobs
This, the source said, triggered a standoff within the CA board, exposing sharp divisions among members and raising serious concerns about the integrity and independence of the recruitment process.
According to insiders, the former senior official has been actively ‘pulling strings’ in an attempt to influence the board by directing who should advance to the interview stage, a move that alarmed a section of the panel members committed to merit-based hiring.
The candidate being pushed, the source said, the panel had looked at their credentials and did not meet the minimum requirements for the said position.
The most troubling issue is that the candidate being pushed does not meet the minimum experience threshold. They have a background in engineering with less than 15 years’ experience required,” the source said.
The Authority’s job requirements for the USF director position stipulate that applicants must hold a Bachelor’s degree in Applied and Physical Sciences, Humanities and Social Sciences, or Business-related studies from a recognised institution, in addition to a Master’s degree in a related field.
The role further requires a minimum of 15 years’ relevant work experience, with at least five years in senior management or a comparable leadership role, as well as completion of a recognised leadership course lasting no less than four weeks.
Additional requirements include membership in a relevant professional body in good standing, possession of a valid practising license where applicable, and demonstrated proficiency in computer applications.
The source said those opposed to the alleged interference argue that bending recruitment rules to accommodate a preferred candidate would erode institutional governance and set a dangerous precedent for future appointments.