New admission rules for advocates training suspended
National
By
Nancy Gitonga
| Oct 07, 2026
The Kenya School of Law (KSL) has suffered a major setback after the High Court suspended implementation of new admission criteria for the Advocates Training Programme (ATP) for the 2027/28 academic year.
Justice John Onyiego issued the orders after certifying as urgent an application by Elizabeth Achieng and Kioo Cha Jamii challenging KSL’s advertisement for admission to the programme.
“A conservatory order, pending the inter partes hearing and determination of the application restraining the first and second respondents from implementing, enforcing, operationalising or otherwise giving effect to the substantive admission criteria contained in the disputed 2027/28 ATP advertisement,” Justice Onyiego ordered.
The judge also barred the respondents from receiving, processing, evaluating or determining applications based on the disputed criteria pending the inter partes hearing on October 13, 2026.
READ MORE
The power of tiny shifts: How culture makes or breaks strategy
Isaac Rodrot and the evolution of Watamu's tourism economy
Afreximbank says Dangote refinery key to conserving Kenya's foreign reserves
Companies linked to Nakumatt in dispute with Stanchart over Sh950m loan
Coop and UN-backed facility unveil financing solution for digital enterprises
Kenya's first Ebola case raises concerns over trade barriers in EAC
How Meta's AI Chief understood the Gen Z assignment in crocs
Banks tighten lending to stem resurgence in bad loans
African capital markets leaders seek to unlock Sh516tr for development
KSL was stopped from admitting, enrolling or commencing training of any person under the 2027/28 ATP pursuant to the contested criteria.
The petitioners argue the advertisement introduced new admission pathways and eligibility requirements not validly established through the applicable statutory or regulatory framework.
Among the changes challenged are alternative admission routes based on combinations of KCSE grades, higher qualifications and the Pre-Bar Examination. They contend that the changes are being introduced amid ongoing legal education reforms and proposed regulations that have not been formally enacted.
A separate but substantially similar petition by advocate Jared Gekombe has also been filed at the High Court, challenging the advertisement and seeking orders suspending its implementation.
The cases raise wider questions about regulation of legal education, entry into the profession and the roles of KSL and the Council of Legal Education.