Blogger to pay Sh3.3 million over defamatory Facebook post
Nyanza
By
Isaiah Gwengi
| Jun 17, 2025
A Siaya court has ordered a blogger to pay Sh3.3 million in damages over a defamatory Facebook post targeting the Chief Executive Officer of the Siaya County Public Service Board.
Michael Ochieng, popularly known as Mike Ochieng on social media, was found to have defamed Wilfred Nyagudi through a post that portrayed him as a man of dubious character and unfit to hold public office.
Resident Magistrate Jacob Mkala awarded Nyagudi Sh3 million as general damages and an additional Sh300,000 as exemplary damages.
According to court documents, Nyagudi said the statements published by Ochieng were false, malicious, and aimed at damaging his reputation and integrity.
READ MORE
Chinese firm to revive fluorspar operations in Kerio Valley
Why counties should rethink their infrastructure financing
Port of Mombasa caught in tariff wars crossfire
Homa Bay traders make a kill as curtains fall on Devolution Conference
EAC states urged to boost intra-regional trade amid barriers
Marketing tech company banks on new platform to link brands with culture and creativity
Eight Kuscco staff on police radar over leaked documents
How shrinking wallets are pushing Kenyans to brand switching
Airtel, Vodacom ink network infrastructure sharing pact
Co-op Bank posts Sh14.1b profit amid branch, digital expansion
He filed a defamation suit after Ochieng failed to retract the statements or offer an apology.
In a judgment delivered on June 13, 2025, Magistrate Mkala ruled that Nyagudi had proved his case on a balance of probabilities.
“From the analysis of evidence placed before me, it is my holding that the plaintiff has made out a case against the defendant. Consequently, judgment is hereby entered for the plaintiff,” the court ruled.
The magistrate further directed Ochieng to permanently delete the defamatory content from all his social media platforms and to issue an unequivocal apology through the same channels.
Nyagudi’s lawyer, Mr Felix Oketch, welcomed the court’s decision and said it should serve as a model for handling grievances stemming from online content.
“People should be careful about posting false information against others without any evidence,” said Mr Oketch, adding that freedom of expression does not give anyone the right to defame others.
He said this should be the way to deal with such cases, and not through assault or killings.